D DEED

ČEŠTINA · TRANSLATION NOT PUBLISHED YET

This page has no approved Czech translation, so you are reading the English original. It is not listed in search results in this language. OPEN THE ENGLISH ORIGINAL ↗

AI

What is the EU AI Act disclosure rule?

THE SHORT ANSWER

Article 50 of the EU AI Act requires providers of certain AI systems to mark synthetic content in a machine-readable format and requires deployers to disclose when content is an AI-generated deepfake. These transparency obligations apply from 2 August 2026, giving providers and deployers a defined runway to build compliant labelling into their systems.

What Article 50 actually requires

Providers of AI systems that generate synthetic audio, image, video or text content must ensure outputs are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated. This is a technical obligation on the tool maker, and a visible watermark alone does not satisfy it. It is meant to let downstream platforms and detection tools identify AI content automatically.

Deployers, meaning the businesses or individuals actually using an AI system to generate or manipulate content, face a separate disclosure duty. If they generate or manipulate image, audio or video content that constitutes a deepfake, meaning it depicts real people, places or events in a way that appears authentic, they must disclose that the content is artificially generated or manipulated.

Deepfakes get a specific carve-out

The deepfake disclosure duty applies whether the deepfake is used for entertainment, satire, art, or anything else, though the AI Act allows the disclosure to be done in a way that does not hamper the display or enjoyment of the work, such as a discreet label rather than an intrusive watermark plastered across the content.

Text generated or manipulated by AI that informs the public on matters of public interest carries its own disclosure obligation too, unless the content has undergone human review and a natural or legal person holds editorial responsibility for it, which is a carve-out aimed at newsrooms using AI-assisted drafting with human editors in the loop.

Machine-readable marking versus visible labels

Machine-readable marking, sometimes implemented through standards like C2PA content credentials, embeds metadata into the file itself so platforms and detection systems can identify AI-generated content programmatically, even if a human viewer sees nothing unusual. This differs from a visible on-screen disclosure aimed at a human audience, and Article 50 contemplates both depending on the obligation and the actor involved.

Timeline and enforcement

The EU AI Act entered into force in August 2024, with obligations phasing in over several years by risk category. The transparency obligations under Article 50, covering marking and disclosure, apply from 2 August 2026, and national market surveillance authorities in each member state are responsible for enforcement, with penalties tied to the Act's broader fine structure.

KEY FACTS

  • 01Article 50 of the EU AI Act governs transparency obligations for AI-generated content.
  • 02Providers must mark synthetic outputs in a machine-readable, detectable format.
  • 03Deployers must disclose when content is an AI-generated deepfake depicting real people, places or events.
  • 04A carve-out exists for AI-assisted news content that has undergone human editorial review.
  • 05The transparency obligations apply from 2 August 2026.
  • 06Machine-readable marking, such as C2PA content credentials, differs from a visible on-screen label.

FAQ

Does the EU AI Act apply outside the EU?

It applies to providers and deployers placing AI systems or their outputs on the EU market or affecting people in the EU, similar in reach to GDPR.

Does a visible watermark satisfy the machine-readable marking requirement?

Not on its own, since the requirement calls for machine-detectable marking, though a visible label can satisfy the separate deployer disclosure duty aimed at human audiences.

Are satire and art exempt from deepfake disclosure?

No, the disclosure duty still applies, but the Act allows it to be implemented in a way that does not interfere with enjoyment of the work.

What happens if a company ignores Article 50?

Non-compliance falls under the AI Act's enforcement and penalty framework, with national authorities able to investigate and fine providers and deployers.

LAST REVIEWED 01. 2. 2026 · ČEŠTINA